124 NGOs worldwide urge Facebook to adopt IHRA definition o antisemitism, fight hate speechm

August 10, 2020

The joint NGOs’ call discloses that in recent remarks given by a senior Facebook representative,  the company “does not have a policy aimed at combatting online antisemitism”, sparking the coalition to urge Facebook to “join the ranks of the historians, advocates, activists, lawmakers, and leaders who compiled the IHRA working definition” and “take responsibility and move toward removing the scourge of antisemitism from today’s most important online public square.”
In an unprecedented joint letter, a coalition of 124 non-profit organizations from around the world have urged Facebook to adopt the widely recognized International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism to fight hate speech on the social media platform.
The letter, which was sent to Facebook’s board and senior management on Friday, follows mounting public pressure urging Facebook to effectively act against hate speech and dangerous disinformation.
The joint NGOs’ call discloses that in recent remarks given by a senior Facebook representative,  the company “does not have a policy aimed at combating online antisemitism”, sparking the coalition to urge Facebook to “join the ranks of the historians, advocates, activists, lawmakers, and leaders who compiled the IHRA working definition” and “take responsibility and move toward removing the scourge of antisemitism from today’s most important online public square.”
In July, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, stated that “Facebook has to get better at finding and removing hateful content.” The joint call by the global coalition of NGOs emphasizes  that antisemitism and effective policies to address it, must be part of Facebook’s decision-making process to tackle hate speech.
Parallel to a surge in violent and murderous attacks against Jewish communities in recent years, online antisemitism has grown exponentially, with social media platforms serving as primary bullying arenas for the world’s oldest hatred. The coalition letter cites studies that “Jews overwhelmingly report that online antisemitism is the most acute form of Jew-hatred they experience.”
So far, nearly 40 countries have already endorsed or adopted the IHRA working definition in some official capacity, either through their membership in the IHRA or independently.
In the US, the definition of antisemitism is clear: The IHRA working definition has been adopted by the State Department, and a recent Presidential Executive Order on Combatting Anti-Semitism instructs the Department of Education to consider the IHRA definition when evaluating Title VI Civil Rights Act complaints of discrimination.
The signatories decision to focus on Facebook stemmed from the social media giant’s recent announcement that it would be revising its policies on hate speech and disinformation. The coalition’s decision was also based on a recognition that Facebook, as the leading social media platform, can set the standard for the social media industry in the fight against online hate. If, and when, Facebook adopts an effective and comprehensive policy to combat online hate speech and antisemitism, other social media platforms such as Twitter and TikTok are likely to follow suit.
Irwin Cotler, the Chair of Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights in Canada, one of the signatories to the letter, stated :”Antisemitism is the oldest, most enduring, most toxic, and most lethal of hatreds – the canary in the minefield of global evil. The IHRA definition is the strongest and most definitive normative framework we have for monitoring and combating antisemitism on a governmental, parliamentary, law-enforcement, and civil society level. Its adoption is as timely as it is necessary.”
Rabbi Menachem Margolin, Chairman of the European Jewish Association, a signatory to the letter said: ”With more people than China and over a third of the entire global population with accounts, Facebook is a world of its own. Its power and reach are immense. With such great power should come great responsibility. That social media platforms have become hotbeds of hate and antisemitism is undeniable. So too is a lack of responsible action from the company to tackle it. Signing up to the IHRA definition would be an important step and a visible commitment from Facebook that there is no place, in the virtual, just as the real world, for the virus of antisemitism to thrive unchecked and unfettered.”
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the Associate Dean and Director Global Social Action Agenda of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, one of the signatories to the letter, noted that ”during the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic and social dislocation following George Floyd’s murder, extremists, including antisemites, leverage the unmatched marketing power of social media to mainstream hate, conspiracy theories and lone wolf terrorism.” ”Facebook must take the lead in the struggle to degrade the mainstreaming of antisemitism via social media. The IHRA definition of antisemitism provides Facebook with a straightforward definition of history’s oldest hate.”
Prof. Dina Porat, who is one of the authors of the IHRA working definition of antisemitism stressed that the definition has become ”a yard stick, a declaration of values.”
”Those who join its adoption are committed to the countering of antisemitism, and of other parallel evils. It is high time that the major social networks, Facebook first and foremost, use the IHRA definition as a criteria to identify antisemitic expressions, and uproot them immediately, thus exercising their responsibility to help create a world better than the one we are living in.”
The article was published on EJP

Additional Articles

Letter to the Prime Minister of the Hellenic Republic about the ban of kosher slaughter

RELIGIOUS LEADERS PLEAD FOR TOLERANCE IN BELGIUM AMID ISRAEL-GAZA WAR

Under the auspices of Belgian MP Michael Freilich, leaders of the 3 major religions came together today in a moment of unity to promote peace and tolerance. (Photos: Michael Freilich/ BELGA)

Jewish MP Michael Freilich: “Given the tensions in our streets, the attack in Brussels, the attack on Jewish targets in Europe and the terrible suffering of war in the Middle East, I decided to take this step and invite Chief Rabbi Pinchas Padwa, Imam Nordine Taouil and priest Rik Hoet to the heart of our democracy, the Parliament in Brussels.”

The press was present in large numbers to attend the reading of a joint statement.

Rabbi Padwa: “We extend a warm call to all people of goodwill in our communities and beyond: Let us join hands, join positive forces and show unity for building a warm society – across our different ideas and beliefs. As this meeting today makes clear, this is absolutely possible.”

Imam Taouil: “There is so much more that unites us than what divides us. Let us not import conflicts from elsewhere and let our lives be guided by extreme ideas and views.
In this country, we are all fellow citizens, neighbours, friends and/or trading partners. Our fragile social fabric, especially in these anxious times, deserves to be nurtured and strengthened. The recent Abraham Accords are an encouraging step in the right direction.

Priest Hoet: “Bringing together different cultures and faiths, sharing joyful moments and building a common future are positive steps that we warmly welcome and encourage.”
Freilich concluded, “Let us strive for peace, warm citizenship and closeness, pause to remember every innocent victim, and resolutely reject and condemn terrorism.”

Rabbi Padwa asked for a moment of prayer, each in their own distinct way, to promote peace.

enlace-judio-logo

Respuestas inesperadas sobre los mejores países europeos para los judíos – Estudio

(JTA) — El sentimiento antisemita prevalece especialmente en Italia y Hungría, según múltiples encuestas. Pero un índice único en su tipo que combina diferentes medidas de la experiencia judía encontró que también son los mejores países europeos para que vivan los judíos.

CNAAN LIPHSHIZ

El índice, presentado el lunes, se basa en un estudio que combina datos de encuestas e información de políticas para crear una métrica única de calidad de vida para los judíos en los 12 países de la Unión Europea con comunidades judías considerables, según Daniel Staetsky, estadístico de la Institute for Jewish Policy Research, con sede en Londres, que escribió el informe para la Asociación Judía Europea en Bruselas.

Dijo que los resultados pueden desafiar las ideas preconcebidas sobre qué países de la UE son más hospitalarios con los judíos. Por ejemplo, Alemania obtuvo una puntuación alta en lo que respecta a las políticas gubernamentales relacionadas con los judíos. Pero los judíos allí reportan una débil sensación de seguridad, lo que lleva a una puntuación general media.

El índice es principalmente una herramienta “para exigir acciones concretas de los líderes europeos”, dijo el rabino Menachem Margolin, director de la Asociación Judía Europea. “Damos la bienvenida a las declaraciones contra el antisemitismo de los líderes europeos. Pero se necesita algo más que declaraciones”.

La Asociación Judía Europea hará recomendaciones individuales a cada país encuestado, agregó Margolin en el evento de prensa. Fue parte de un evento de dos días patrocinado por múltiples organizaciones judías, incluido el Consistoire en Francia, la Agencia Judía para Israel y el gobierno israelí, sobre cómo las comunidades judías europeas pueden ayudar a la de Ucrania.

Titulado “Europa y los judíos, un índice de país de respeto y tolerancia hacia los judíos”, el estudio otorga a BélgicaPolonia y Francia las puntuaciones más bajas con 60, 66 y 68 puntos sobre 100, respectivamente. Los tres primeros países tienen 79, 76 y 75 puntos, seguidos de Gran Bretaña y Austria (75), Países BajosSueciaAlemania y España (74, 73, 72, 70).

Para elaborar el ranking, Staetsky otorgó calificaciones a cada país encuestado en múltiples temas, incluido el sentido de seguridad judío, las actitudes públicas hacia los judíos y la cantidad de judíos que dijeron que habían experimentado antisemitismo. Las calificaciones se basaron en las principales encuestas de opinión de los últimos años, incluidas las realizadas por la Liga de Acción y Protección, un grupo que monitorea los crímenes de odio contra los judíos en varios países europeos, y la Agencia de Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea.

El estudio combinó esos puntajes con los puntajes que el autor le dio a las políticas gubernamentales de los países, incluida su financiación para las comunidades judías, si habían adoptado una definición de antisemitismo y el estado de la educación sobre el Holocausto y la libertad de culto.

Bajo ese sistema de puntaje, Alemania recibió un puntaje general de 72 a pesar de tener el mejor puntaje (89) en el desempeño del gobierno en temas relacionados con los judíos y un sólido 92 en lo que respecta a la prevalencia del antisemitismo. Pero una puntuación relativamente baja en el sentido de seguridad de los judíos (46) perjudicó su puntuación general, entre otros factores.

En el caso de Hungría, “el puntaje que recibió refleja la realidad sobre el terreno”, según Shlomo Koves, jefe del grupo paraguas de comunidades judías en Hungría EMIH, afiliado a Chabad. “Los judíos pueden caminar por aquí, ir a la sinagoga, sin el menor temor al acoso”, dijo.

Pero la prevalencia de sentimientos antisemitas en la sociedad húngara (una encuesta de la Liga Antidifamación de 2015 encontró que alrededor del 30% de la población los tiene) “muestra que también hay trabajo por hacer aquí, en educación y divulgación”, dijo Koves.

https://www.enlacejudio.com/2022/06/21/respuestas-inesperadas-sobre-los-mejores-paises-europeos-para-los-judios-estudio/amp/

EJA in the Media January 2020- January 2021

 
 
 
 

Additional Communities
United Kingdom
Ukraine
Turkey
Schweiz
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Russia