Antisemitism Requires a United Front – More Definitions Won’t Help

September 11, 2024

The ongoing debate about antisemitism and the lack of action against antisemitic attacks clearly shows that we need a united front in the fight against this hatred. Many organizations and actors are trying, with good intentions, to create new definitions of antisemitism to better describe the current situation. However, instead of helping, these initiatives risk dividing, delaying, and ultimately making it even harder to move forward.

The antisemitic attacks we see today often aim to criticize Israel for the situation in Gaza. And it is, of course, terrible. But even if we have different opinions about the conflict and its causes, we should all agree that regardless of what one thinks about the situation in Gaza, it is unacceptable that Swedish Jews feel threatened and unsafe here because people are angry at another country.

The IHRA definition of antisemitism, which Sweden adopted under Stefan Löfven’s government, is the most recognized and widely used internationally. It provides clear guidance on when criticism of the State of Israel crosses the line into antisemitic attacks against Jews. Adhering to this definition is crucial for effectively identifying and combating antisemitism.

In times of populism, where simple solutions to complex problems are often sought, it is even more important to stand firm on principles such as a common definition of antisemitism. Creating new definitions, even if the intentions are good, complicates the work against the hatred directed at Jews today. It causes us to remain stagnant rather than unite and take strong action against the rising antisemitism.

To move forward, we must work together based on a common definition – and the IHRA definition is our strongest tool in this fight.

Released in https://fores.se/tisdagsklubben/

By David Lega

Additional Articles

Chief rabbi says Dutch Labour Party opposed an anti-Semitism definition to woo Muslims

AMSTERDAM (JTA) — Dutch Chief Rabbi Binyomin Jacobs said he was “shocked” that the Labour Party rejected a motion calling for the adoption of a definition of anti-Semitism, saying its vote aimed to curry favor with some Muslim voters.
On Tuesday, a majority of lawmakers in the lower house of the Dutch parliament, the  Tweede Kamer, passed a nonbinding motion calling on the government to adopt the definition of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. But Labour, along with all the other left-wing parties, voted against it.
The definition has been adopted as official policy by the United Kingdom, Germany and five others in the European Union, as well as the EU as a whole.
Some pro-Palestinian activists have opposed the definition because it says that some forms of vitriol against Israel are anti-Semitic.
Jacobs, a member of the Rabbinical Center of Europe, rarely comments on political votes. He made an exception here.
The lawmakers who voted against the motion, he said, “did so out of political considerations.” Asked whether he meant that Labour opposed the motion to woo some Muslim voters, he said “Yes.”
Labour leader Lodewijk Asscher declined to say why his party voted against the motion, Ernst Lissauer, a prominent freelance journalist, wrote on Twitter.
‏Bram van Ojik of Green Left told Lissauer: “Anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel should be kept separate.”
On Wednesday, Jacobs and Rabbi Izak Vorst, the co-heads of Chabad’s team of emissaries to the Netherlands, attended an early Hanukkah candle-lighting ceremony at the Dutch parliament in The Hague. Khadija Arib, the chairwoman of the Tweede Kamer, also attended along with Ankie Broekers-Knol, chairwoman of the Eerste Kamer, or Senate.
Despite Labour’s vote, Jacobs said, “There is real determination in the Dutch political establishment to fight anti-Semitism, and the chairwomen’s remarks at the event reflected that.”
The article was published on JTA

Is there a Western-Arab alliance (plus Israel) in the making?

On Monday, EIPA held a press briefing in Rome with Prof. Uzi Rabi, one of Israel’s leading Middle East scholars and Iran experts.

Prof. Rabi’s briefing gave detailed insight into the current trends of shifting Middle East alliances catalysed primarily by:

(1) Iran’s alliances and hegemonic aspirations; 

(2) future consolidation, projected takeover and extremist radicalisation of power in the post-Ayatollah Chameini era in the Islamic Republic by extremist factions controlled by Chameini’s son (Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei) together with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; 

(3) Iran’s enablement of Hamas and Hezbollah in Israel’s multifront war (Gaza and the Lebanese border), Russia in its offence against Ukraine, militant groups in Iraq and Syria, etc. – all of which serve to prolong regional wars; 

(4) the tightrope balancing act that Middle Eastern states are playing in the jostling of diplomatic power between the United States and China; 

(5) Iranian activities in the drug trade in places as far away as Colombia and Venezuela and how all of this is influencing the jostling of alliances in the greater Middle East.

Professor Uzi Rabi is Principal Researcher and Head of the Regional Cooperation Programme at the Moshe Dayan Centre for Middle East and African Studies and Principal Researcher at the Centre for Iran Studies, both at the University of Tel Aviv. Previously, he was head of the Department of Middle Eastern and African History at Tel Aviv University.

Prof. Rabi’s research focuses on modern history and the evolution of states and societies in the Middle East, on relations between Iran and Arabia, on oil and politics in the Middle East and on the dynamics between Sunnis and Shiites; in this context, he has supervised the theses of numerous doctoral students in this field over the years.

CALL FOR ACTION- Red Lines!

It is still not too late to take a stand and make a diference in the lives of Jews all across Europe!
And it’s a lot easier then what you might think. How?
Read all about our Red Lines Here .
Take a stand! Get involved! Fight antisemitism!
For a short explanation klick on the picture or go to the following link: https://www.facebook.com/ejassociation/videos/286901565522129/

 

Deutsche_Welle_logo

Jewish group urges halt to Nazi memorabilia auction featuring Hitler's wristwatch

In an open letter co-signed by 34 Jewish leaders, the Brussels-based European Jewish Association (EJA) called for Maryland-based Alexander Historical Auctions to abandon its sale of a slew of Nazi objects.

The items auctioned by the broker include a gold watch and candy bowl belonging to Adolf Hitler, and items belonging to his partner, Eva Braun, including a dress and dog collar for her terrier.

Also on sale are Wehrmacht toilet paper and the cutlery and champagne glasses of senior Nazi figures.

The highest valued item — the watch belonging to Hitler — was expected to fetch between $2 million (€1.97 million) and $4 million. The sale was taking place over two days from Thursday to Friday.

Deutsche_Welle_logo
Additional Communities
United Kingdom
Ukraine
Turkey
Schweiz
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Russia